government public service

English

Domain 'arrogant-amaranth-qlbe4qtobn-hbhyfrzpu9.edgeone.app' uses the application-focused generic top-level domain (.app) with subdomain 'arrogant-amaranth-qlbe4qtobn-hbhyfrzpu9'. The second-level label 'edgeone' is 7 characters long holding 4 vowels versus three consonants. Splitting it apart reveals two words: edge, one. The median word length lands at 3.5 characters. No strong language cues emerged from the frequency lists.

html/9f/cf/9fcfc64c-0abb-4a67-809b-7b4b39200925.html.gz

require-trusted-types-for 'script'; report-uri https://csp.withgoogle.com/csp/apps-themes

4a560f3b5b07dadbb9dab660b4dedddefa7a69a94bf12f6d504371840c9ff90b

viewport

html/9f/cf/9fcfc64c-0abb-4a67-809b-7b4b39200925_nodriver.html.gz

arrogant-amaranth-qlbe4qtobn-hbhyfrzpu9.edgeone.app

Prudence Malinki

MarkMonitor Inc.

edgeone.app

Abuse

Google LLC

GOOGLE


// ─── DATA ───
const questions = [
  {
    q: "Which of the following best describes the primary objective of the private member Bill mentioned in the passage?",
    opts: [
      "To restore the executive primacy established during the First Judges case (1981).",
      "To dissolve the collegium system and replace it entirely with the NJAC.",
      "To enhance social representation in the judiciary and improve geographic access to the Supreme Court.",
      "To reduce the number of pending cases by limiting the Supreme Court's jurisdiction to Delhi only."
    ],
    reasons: [
      "❌ Incorrect. The Bill does not seek to restore executive primacy as in 1981. The 1981 model gave the government final say in judicial appointments, but the Bill's focus is on diversity and regional access — not executive control.",
      "❌ Incorrect. The Bill does not propose replacing the collegium with the NJAC. The NJAC was struck down in 2015; the Bill's objective is to mandate diversity and set up regional benches.",
      "✅ Correct. The Bill introduced by P. Wilson focuses on two reforms: mandating diversity in judicial appointments and establishing regional benches of the Supreme Court to improve geographic access to justice.",
      "❌ Incorrect. The Bill actually proposes the opposite — establishing regional benches in cities like Kolkata, Mumbai, and Chennai to expand access, not limiting jurisdiction to Delhi."
    ]
  },
  {
    q: "Based on the passage, why was the National Judicial Appointments Commission (NJAC) ultimately invalidated?",
    opts: [
      "It failed to address the issue of kith and kin being favoured for judicial appointments.",
      "The Supreme Court deemed it a violation of the \"basic structure\" concerning judicial independence.",
      "It was found to be statistically ineffective in increasing the proportion of SC/ST judges.",
      "The Union Law Minister refused to participate in the commission's proceedings."
    ],
    reasons: [
      "❌ Incorrect. While nepotism (kith and kin) is cited as a criticism of the collegium system, it was not the stated ground for striking down the NJAC. The court struck it down on constitutional grounds.",
      "✅ Correct. The Supreme Court struck down the NJAC in 2015 on the ground that it violated the 'basic structure' of the Constitution — specifically the doctrine of judicial independence.",
      "❌ Incorrect. The passage mentions the lack of SC/ST representation as a criticism of the collegium, not a reason the NJAC was struck down. The NJAC was invalidated on constitutional grounds, not statistical ones.",
      "❌ Incorrect. No such reason is mentioned in the passage. The NJAC was invalidated by the Supreme Court through a judicial review, not because of any minister's refusal."
    ]
  },
  {
    q: "According to the statistics provided for the 2018–2024 period, which group had the lowest representation in higher judicial appointments?",
    opts: [
      "Scheduled Castes (SC)",
      "Scheduled Tribes (ST)",
      "Women",
      "Religious Minorities"
    ],
    reasons: [
      "❌ Incorrect. SC, ST, and OBC together accounted for only 20% — but the passage separately states women were less than 15% and religious minorities were less than 5%. So SC alone is not the lowest.",
      "❌ Incorrect. ST is part of the combined 20% figure (SC+ST+OBC). While low, religious minorities at less than 5% had even lower representation as a distinct group.",
      "❌ Incorrect. Women represented less than 15% of higher judiciary appointments — which is low, but religious minorities at less than 5% had the lowest representation.",
      "✅ Correct. Religious minorities accounted for less than 5% of judicial appointments between 2018 and 2024 — the lowest of all groups mentioned in the passage."
    ]
  },
  {
    q: "What inference can be drawn from the \"First Judges case (1981)\" as described in the sources?",
    opts: [
      "The judiciary was already using a collegium system but decided to give it up.",
      "At that time, the court valued executive accountability to the public over the absolute insulation of the judiciary.",
      "The President had no power to consult the CJI before the 1980s.",
      "It was the first time the Supreme Court suggested setting up regional benches."
    ],
    reasons: [
      "❌ Incorrect. The collegium system was established only in 1993 through the Second Judges case. In 1981, the collegium did not exist — the process was executive-heavy.",
      "✅ Correct. In the First Judges case (1981), the Supreme Court upheld executive primacy, citing accountability to the people. This shows the court at that time prioritised democratic accountability over complete insulation of the judiciary from the executive.",
      "❌ Incorrect. The passage states the Constitution under Articles 124 and 217 always required the President to consult the CJI. The consultation was required; the dispute was about how binding it was.",
      "❌ Incorrect. There is no mention in the passage of regional benches being raised during the 1981 case. Regional benches are discussed in the context of the recent private member Bill."
    ]
  },
  {
    q: "What is the proposed functional distinction between the \"main Constitution bench\" and the proposed \"regional benches\"?",
    opts: [
      "Regional benches would handle criminal cases, while the Delhi bench would handle civil cases.",
      "Regional benches would have no jurisdiction, serving only as filing centres.",
      "Regional benches would exercise full jurisdiction except for cases of constitutional importance, which remain in Delhi.",
      "The Delhi bench would only oversee appointments, while regional benches would handle all litigation."
    ],
    reasons: [
      "❌ Incorrect. The passage makes no criminal/civil distinction. The proposed distinction is based on constitutional importance, not the nature of cases as civil or criminal.",
      "❌ Incorrect. The Bill proposes regional benches with full jurisdiction — they are not mere filing centres. They would hear and decide cases, except those of constitutional importance.",
      "✅ Correct. The passage states the Bill proposes regional benches in Kolkata, Mumbai, and Chennai to exercise full jurisdiction, except for matters of constitutional importance, which would remain with the bench in Delhi.",
      "❌ Incorrect. The passage does not suggest the Delhi bench would only handle appointments. Appointments remain with the collegium. The Constitution bench in Delhi would handle constitutional matters."
    ]
  },
  {
    q: "Which \"long-term reform\" is suggested to make the judicial consultation process \"broad-based and inclusive\"?",
    opts: [
      "Reverting to the 1981 model where the executive has the final say.",
      "Increasing the number of senior judges in the collegium from four to ten.",
      "Reviving the NJAC by including representatives from the legislature, bar council, and academia.",
      "Moving the entire seat of the Supreme Court from Delhi to a more central location."
    ],
    reasons: [
      "❌ Incorrect. The passage does not propose reverting to executive primacy. The suggested reform is about broadening the appointment body to include diverse stakeholders, not handing power back to the government.",
      "❌ Incorrect. The passage does not suggest changing the number of judges in the collegium. The reform suggested is about the composition and inclusivity of the appointment process itself.",
      "✅ Correct. The passage suggests a 'modified NJAC' that would include representatives from the legislature, bar council, and academia to make the judicial appointment process both inclusive and independent.",
      "❌ Incorrect. Moving the Supreme Court physically is not suggested as a reform. The passage discusses regional benches — which are different from relocating the apex court's seat."
    ]
  }
];

const correctAnswers = [2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 2];
const letters = ['A','B','C','D'];

let userAnswers = new Array(6).fill(null);
let currentQ = 0;
let isSubscribed = false;

// Track last click time per option for double-click detection
let lastClickInfo = { qIndex: -1, optIndex: -1, time: 0 };

// ─── SCREEN NAV ───
function showScreen(id) {
  document.querySelectorAll('.screen').forEach(s => s.classList.remove('active'));
  document.getElementById(id).classList.add('active');
  window.scrollTo(0,0);
}

function startQuiz() {
  showScreen('quiz-screen');
  buildDots();
  renderQuestion();
}

function goToSubscribe() {
  showScreen('subscribe-screen');
}

function onSubscribeClick() {
  setTimeout(() => {
    document.getElementById('view-analysis-btn').style.display = 'flex';
  }, 2000);
}

function showResult(subscribed) {
  if (subscribed) isSubscribed = true;
  showScreen('result-screen');
  buildResult();
}

function restartQuiz() {
  userAnswers = new Array(6).fill(null);
  currentQ = 0;
  isSubscribed = false;
  showScreen('start-screen');
}

function togglePassage() {
  const card = document.getElementById('passage-card');
  card.classList.toggle('open');
}

// ─── DOTS ───
function buildDots() {
  const c = document.getElementById('dots');
  c.innerHTML = '';
  questions.forEach((_,i) => {
    const d = document.createElement('div');
    d.className = 'dot';
    d.onclick = () => { currentQ = i; renderQuestion(); };
    c.appendChild(d);
  });
}

function updateDots() {
  document.querySelectorAll('.dot').forEach((d,i) => {
    d.className = 'dot';
    if (userAnswers[i] !== null) d.classList.add('answered');
    if (i === currentQ) d.classList.add('current');
  });
}

// ─── RENDER QUESTION ───
function renderQuestion() {
  const q = questions[currentQ];
  document.getElementById('qnum-badge').textContent = 'Q ' + (currentQ+1);
  document.getElementById('q-label-txt').textContent = 'Question ' + (currentQ+1) + ' of 6';
  document.getElementById('question-text').textContent = q.q;

  const answered = userAnswers.filter(a=>a!==null).length;
  document.getElementById('progress-fill').style.width = (answered/6*100)+'%';
  document.getElementById('progress-label').textContent = answered + ' of 6 answered';

  const optsEl = document.getElementById('options');
  optsEl.innerHTML = '';

  q.opts.forEach((opt, i) => {
    const el = document.createElement('div');
    el.className = 'option' + (userAnswers[currentQ] === i ? ' selected' : '');
    el.dataset.optIndex = i;

    el.onclick = () => handleOptionClick(i, el);

    el.innerHTML = `<div class="opt-bubble">${letters[i]}</div>
                    <div class="opt-right"><div class="opt-text">${opt}</div></div>`;
    optsEl.appendChild(el);
  });

  updateDots();
  updateNav();
}

function handleOptionClick(optIndex, el) {
  const now = Date.now();
  const isSelected = userAnswers[currentQ] === optIndex;
  const DOUBLE_CLICK_THRESHOLD = 400; // ms

  const isDoubleClick = (
    lastClickInfo.qIndex === currentQ &&
    lastClickInfo.optIndex === optIndex &&
    (now - lastClickInfo.time) < DOUBLE_CLICK_THRESHOLD
  );

  lastClickInfo = { qIndex: currentQ, optIndex: optIndex, time: now };

  if (isSelected && isDoubleClick) {
    // UNMARK
    userAnswers[currentQ] = null;
    el.classList.remove('selected');
    el.classList.add('unmark-flash');
    setTimeout(() => el.classList.remove('unmark-flash'), 400);
    renderQuestion();
    return;
  }

  // Normal select
  userAnswers[currentQ] = optIndex;
  renderQuestion();
}

function navigate(dir) {
  currentQ = Math.max(0, Math.min(5, currentQ + dir));
  renderQuestion();
}

function updateNav() {
  document.getElementById('prev-btn').disabled = currentQ === 0;
  const nb = document.getElementById('next-btn');
  nb.disabled = currentQ === 5;
  if (currentQ === 5) nb.style.display = 'none'; else nb.style.display = '';
  document.getElementById('submit-btn').style.display = 'inline-flex';
}

// ─── BUILD RESULT ───
function buildResult() {
  let correct=0, wrong=0, skip=0;
  userAnswers.forEach((a,i) => {
    if (a===null) skip++;
    else if (a===correctAnswers[i]) correct++;
    else wrong++;
  });
  const score = correct*4 - wrong*1;

  document.getElementById('r-score').textContent = score;
  document.getElementById('r-correct').textContent = correct;
  document.getElementById('r-wrong').textContent = wrong;
  document.getElementById('r-skip').textContent = skip;

  const pct = Math.max(0,score)/24;
  const dash = 408;
  const offset = dash - (dash * pct);
  const ring = document.getElementById('ring-fill');
  setTimeout(()=>{ ring.style.strokeDashoffset = offset; ring.style.stroke = score<0?'#dc2626':score<12?'#f5a623':'#16a34a'; }, 100);

  const hd = score>=20?"Outstanding! 🏆" : score>=16?"Excellent! 🌟" : score>=12?"Well Done! 📚" : score>=8?"Good Effort! 💪" : "Keep Studying! 📖";
  document.getElementById('r-heading').textContent = hd;

  const list = document.getElementById('analysis-list');
  list.innerHTML = '';

  questions.forEach((q, qi) => {
    const ua = userAnswers[qi];
    const ca = correctAnswers[qi];
    const isCorrect = ua===ca;
    const isSkip = ua===null;

    const card = document.createElement('div');
    card.className = 'a-card ' + (isCorrect?'a-correct':isSkip?'a-skip':'a-wrong');

    const statusLabel = isCorrect ? '<span class="a-status st-c">✅ Correct</span>' :
                        isSkip   ? '<span class="a-status st-s">⏭ Skipped</span>' :
                                   '<span class="a-status st-w">❌ Wrong</span>';
    const marksLabel  = isCorrect ? '<span class="marks-tag pos">+4</span>' :
                        isSkip   ? '<span class="marks-tag zero">0</span>' :
                                   '<span class="marks-tag neg">−1</span>';

    let optsHtml = '';
    q.opts.forEach((opt, oi) => {
      const isCA = oi === ca;
      const isUA = oi === ua;
      const isWrongSelected = isUA && !isCorrect && !isSkip;

      // Determine classes
      let cls = '';
      if (isCA) cls = 'ao-correct';
      else if (isWrongSelected) cls = 'ao-wrong';

      // Determine if we show reason
      // After subscribe: show reason for ALL wrong options (not selected by student too) + correct option
      // Before subscribe: show only if selected by student (correct or wrong)
      let reasonHtml = '';

      if (isSubscribed) {
        // Show reason for: correct option always, all wrong options always
        if (isCA) {
          reasonHtml = `<div class="a-reason">${q.reasons[oi]}</div>`;
        } else {
          // Show all wrong option reasons when subscribed
          reasonHtml = `<div class="a-reason" style="background:rgba(220,38,38,0.07);color:#991b1b;border-left:3px solid var(--wrong)">${q.reasons[oi]}</div>`;
        }
      } else {
        // Before subscribe: only show for student's selected options
        if (isCA && isUA) {
          // Correctly selected — show correct reason
          reasonHtml = `<div class="a-reason">${q.reasons[oi]}</div>`;
        } else if (isWrongSelected) {
          // Student chose wrong — show why it's wrong
          reasonHtml = `<div class="a-reason">${q.reasons[oi]}</div>`;
        } else if (isCA && !isCorrect) {
          // Show correct answer but lock the explanation
          reasonHtml = `<div class="locked-reason">🔒 Subscribe to Thinkora on YouTube to unlock the full explanation</div>`;
        } else if (!isCA && !isUA) {
          // Non-selected wrong options — show locked
          reasonHtml = `<div class="locked-reason">🔒 Subscribe to unlock explanation</div>`;
        }
      }

      optsHtml += `
        <div class="a-opt ${cls}">
          <div class="a-bubble">${letters[oi]}</div>
          <div class="a-opt-right">
            <div class="a-opt-text">${opt}</div>
            ${reasonHtml}
          </div>
        </div>`;
    });

    card.innerHTML = `
      <div class="a-top">
        <div class="a-qnum">Q${qi+1}</div>
        <div style="display:flex;align-items:center;gap:10px">${statusLabel}${marksLabel}</div>
      </div>
      <div class="a-qtext">${q.q}</div>
      <div class="a-opts">${optsHtml}</div>`;

    list.appendChild(card);
  });
}


✅ Low Risk - https://arrogant-amaranth-qlbe4qtobn-hbhyfrzpu9.edgeone.app/

Requests	IP Address	Location	AS Autonomous System
9	43.152.26.58	Singapore	AS139341ACE
9	1	-	-

Security Scan Report: arrogant-amaranth-qlbe4qtobn-hbhyfrzpu9.edgeone.app

Summary

AI Security Verdict

Safe Website

Safety Factors

Details

Screenshot

Page Load Overview

Language Analysis

Primary Language

Detection Details

Website Classification

Primary Category

All Detected Categories

Detected Features

Domain & IP Information

Content Similarity HashesFor malware variant detection

TLSH (Trend Micro Locality Sensitive Hash)

ssdeep (Context Triggered Piecewise Hashing)

sdhash (Similarity Digest Hashing)

Image Hashes

Perceptual Hashes

Other Hashes

Scan History